E3, the best Electronics Entertainment Expo in years, mostly
Greetings Readers!
As promised, I am here to share my thoughts on this year's E3. I'm not going to address every game that was talked about, but more of my thoughts from the main press events, so here we go.
Lets start off with Microsoft. This event was mind blowing! I found myself sitting in my chair several hours after the event still saying "holy crap!" The past couple of years have been a rather big disappointment from all of the major companies but this even alone makes up for all of it. Before I address Project Natal, which was the main "holy crap!" moment from the event, lets talk games and Xbox functionality. There were a ton of great titles that were announced at this years Microsoft press event, including Forza Motorsport 3, Halo Reach, Left 4 Dead 2, Crackdown 2, Metal Gear Solid Rising and even a Beatles version of Rock Band. These were great announcements as many of the major titles including Halo Reach, Left 4 Dead 2 and Metal Gear Solid Rising were completely unexpected. In terms of games, it looks to be a very bright year for the Xbox 360. They also announced some great new additions to Xbox Live including Last.fm, Facebook and even Twitter integration. This will do wonders for making the 360 become apart of your social network life. They also announced better quality video streaming which is awesome too. Finally, the biggest announcement was Project Natal. This is Microsoft's one-up on the Wii motion controller. When this is released, you will be able to interact with your 360 and games with no controller at all, just by moving your body. If that wasn't cool enough, it can react to voice commands. I cant say enough about this, so head here to check out the demo of it.
Nintendo was the second person to present at this years E3 and it made for a great opportunity to take a nap. After the stellar event from Microsoft, Nintendo could have put just about anybody to sleep. The major problem with Nintendo's press event was that it was largely old news and not the announcements that people were hoping for. They spent a fair bit of time talking about the Wii Motion Plus which they announced and showed at length last year but doesn't come out until this week. Nothing spectacular was shown with this, just another demo of Wii Sports Resort which was also announced last year. The Wii Fit was also talked about at length and they announced a new expansion for the Wii Fit with some new exercises and stuff for those that still use the Wii Fit, all 2 of you. Other than those disappointments, this year was the year of Mario. A number of new Mario titles were announced including a new Super Mario Bros which allows up to 4 people to play at once and Mario Galaxy 2. Other than Mario which didn't seem to overly excite many people, the only other major announcement was a new Metroid game. While it looks interesting, I am not a Metroid fan so I can't say it had my jumping up and down and it didn't seem to get that big of reaction from the crowd. There was no news about a Zelda game or anything that people were expecting other than after the event, one of the Nintendo people said one was in the works. Generally, it was a complete snooze although a 4 player Mario does look interesting.
Finally, the last to present was Sony. Unlike Nintendo, this one was pretty exciting too although just slightly below the Microsoft event. They demo'd a bunch of major new games that nearly all look amazing including Assassins Creed 2, Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker and even my personal favorite, God of War 3. There were a ton of great looking games announced but they took a back seat to the two major announcements, the PSP Go which I have already blogged about here and here, as well as their own version of motion control that looks like the Wiimote's uglier, more powerful cousin. While it kicks the butt of the Wii motion control, its not quite as impressive as Project Natal. Overall, they put on a great event.
Between Microsoft and Sony, this was an amazing year at E3 which Nintendo gave everybody a great nap opportunity. This certainly looks to be an exciting time for gamers over the next year and I can't wait to play the many games that are coming out. What did you think of everything that happened at E3 this year?
Check out the latest Global Geek News Podcast!
-Jeremy “pcnerd37″ Bray
Is Twitter looking to charge per tweet?
Greetings Readers!
For years now, people have been asking how twitter is going to make money. Earlier this week, their stance on some of the ideas including advertising became a bit more clear although we still haven't seen any indication that any form of monetization is coming down the pipes. Could Twitter be planning something so sinister that they don't want anybody knowing yet? Could they be planning to...charge per tweet?!
For whatever reason, the idea of charging per tweet never gets discussed much when people talk about how twitter can make money, but it is possibly the way that the service can make the most money. Sure, some users would be pissed if they were charged per tweet, but wireless carriers have been able to make this service work with text messages for years. Wireless carriers typically give customers several options when it comes to texting, you can pay per text, for a certain number of texts and then pay per text above that or for unlimited texts. Considering how much is charged for texts and how little they cost the carrier to send, it is a huge cash cow for wireless carriers. Not only does it make them a ton of money, but it also keeps the demand on the service at a more manageable level because people will more closely regulate how much they use the service.
This could be the perfect model for twitter. If twitter was to charge you a subscription fee that allows you so many tweets per month and then pay for anything over that like wireless carriers do with text messaging, they would need huge trucks just to haul all of their money to the bank. Having an unlimited subscription plan would be great and benefit the heaviest of users because it could take some of the current restrictions off in terms of number of tweets that can be sent per day. Of course there would be a free tier that would allow you to send so many tweets per month that while reasonable, would entice people to pay for a higher number of tweets. This would also solve one of twitter's biggest issues, stability. If people were forced to keep a better eye on how much they tweet (unless they have an unlimited plan), twitter wouldn't constantly run into the the growing pains that it seems to continually suffer from. Until recently, they hadn't been a major issue since the fairly early days of the service, but the scaling issues seems to have returned now that Twitter has gone mainstream and this would be the best possible way to slow the growth and use of twitter until they can keep up with it while making a ton of money at the same time. They can kill two fail whales with one stone.
Will Twitter adopt this model as a way to make money and keep the site from growing faster than they can keep up with it or will they find another avenue for monetization? Time will tell.
Check out the latest Global Geek News Podcast!
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Don’t let your social networks become your enemy in lawsuits
Greetings Readers,
For a long time now, I have advocated being very careful of what you put on your social networks. From compromising photos on your facebook page to tweets about your desire to become the next Hitler, anything you post on social networks can and will likely be used against you if you don't think twice before posting them. Not only can those drunken party pictures damage your chances of landing that great job, but they can also screw you out of winning a lawsuit.
This week, a man in Canada who was suing for damages resulting from two car accidents in 2001 and 2003 had many of his claims rejected because what he had posted on facebook was the complete opposite of what he was alleging in his lawsuit. Long story short, he claimed that his social life had gone down the tubes and that his friends wouldn't speak to him, but his facebook pictures showed him hosting parties and socializing with a good number of friends. The $1.3 million lawsuit only got him $40,000 thanks to the photos.
If you are going say one thing, especially in places where it really maters like a courtroom or a job interview, it is generally a very bad idea to have evidence to the contrary on your facebook profile, flickr page or any other social network to which you belong. Not only can the truth come out and screw you (that is what you get for being dishonest), but social networks are a better way for people to get to know you which might not be a good thing depending on what you want them believing about you.
In the end, you have two real options, be completely honest with everybody at all times incase they want to check up on you, or think twice about what you put online and what people will think about what you post.
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Is Twitter Good or Bad for the Swine-Flu?
Greetings Readers!
After seeing non-stop coverage of flu fears, I decided I should write my thoughts on the relationship between swine-flu and twitter.
If you haven't heard of the swine-flu, especially if you use Twitter, you are likely living under a rock on another planet and don't understand any human languages. The swine-flu is the talk of all of the news outlets on tv, radio and the internet. While I will admit that I believe that the massive amount of coverage that the swine-flu is getting in mainstream media is beyond overkill and done to either increase ratings or cause panic (which would be another story to boost ratings), I think the real story is how it is being talked about on social networking sites, in particular, Twitter.
Twitter can be a wonderful tool for spreading information quickly and efficiently (assuming that the service is actually working), but it can also be a tool to cause more harm than good. With people constantly retweeting the latest bit of information, which many times can be inaccurate, it is easy to see how such a service can take an issue such as swine-flu and blow it so far out of proportion that it causes panic. I believe that this is what is happening. While I will admit that there has been some good discussion and some informative links that have been passed around, most of the twitter chatter hasn't been helpful to the swine-flu cause. Whether its jokes that try to make light of the seriousness of the outbreak or those that tweet out of a state of panic because the flu is in their area or those that just flood their twitter stream with any swine-flu related link, no matter how inaccurate it is, many of the people that are discussing the swine-flu on Twitter are causing more harm than good. If you have uninformed people in a state of panic sending out information about what they are panicking about, then it only serves to create even more uninformed people in a state of panic. The last thing we need on twitter is more FUD.
How should we be twittering the swine-flu outbreak you ask? There are several ways you can make sure you are a part of the solution and not part of the problem. First, if you see a new link going around that has already been tweeted by several people you follow, especially those with hundreds of thousands of followers, there is no need for you to retweet the same information again. All that will do is annoy your followers because instead of posting something original, you are just copying the same thing that everybody else is posting. Second, make sure you have the most up-to-date information available. Twittering about old reports won't help anybody, especially when older reports tend to be more inaccurate than what is new at the time since many places don't bother to update their stories. Last, unless you have a confirmed case of swine-flu, don't twitter about it. I realize that being sick sucks, but saying you think you have swine-flu just because you have flu-like symptoms only serves to create panic in your community.
If you have suggestions for how people can be part of the solution instead of the problem, please post them in the comments.
- Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Aggregated Media Guilt
Greetings Readers!
Do you ever feel guilty when you get behind on podcasts, rss feeds, tweets or any other form of aggregated media? I have been suffering from this guilt which I like to call 'Aggregated Media Guilt' or AMG for short for quite some time and I think its time to address it here.
I can honestly say that I have been suffering from AMG ever since I started listening to podcasts. I would often download podcasts without time to listen to them and end up falling behind. This gave me a sense of guilt because I had a ton of podcasts that I never got around to listening to. Sometimes I would merely delete them and try to forget about them, but many times the guilt was such that I would end up spending a minimum of 9 hours a day listening to podcasts just so I could be caught up and not miss anything. At the time, I only had this guilt from podcasts, but I hadn't really discovered the wonders that are Twitter and RSS feeds.
Eventually, I became an avid Twitter and RSS reader user which has been just as bad if not worse than the guilt I suffered from podcasts. Now, I am checking my Twitter every few minutes, reading over 100 tweets every morning when I get up to make sure I haven't missed anything and reading hundreds of items in my Google Reader every day. Why am I doing this? I have this feeling that if I don't, I am missing out on something. I will admit that many things in my RSS feed or Twitter feed are things that I don't care about or just a bunch of people saying the same thing. While this ultimately sucks up more time to sift through these items, I feel it is necessary so I don't miss something that I find important. I am not one to get addicted to anything, but I admit that I have become an aggregated media addict.
Do you or people you know suffer from the same problem? Do you fell like you are missing something if you don't see everything?
I believe I have come up with a solution. I find that if I have a manageable level of aggregated media, I experience guilt, but if I have a source of aggregated media that is not possible to keep up with, the guilt goes away. For example, I follow around 200 people on Twitter. This is a fairly manageable feed as there is probably only in the neighborhood of 500 updates a day or so. Some of those updates I find valuable and others I don't so they get glanced over. In the end, I am trying to find the value which makes me check my Twitter every couple of minutes to see what I have missed and what conversations I can join in on. Friendfeed on the other hand is very different for me. I follow a large number of people on there so that there is so much stuff that is aggregated and passes by that there is no possible way that I can read everything. Realizing this, it completely changes my mindset and gets rid of my guilt. By knowing that I cant keep up with it no matter how hard I try, it frees me from thinking I need to spend all of my time trying to consume what is shared.
In the end, with the way that comments and likes are done with FriendFeed, it becomes much easier for me to pick out the interesting items on FriendFeed because there is generally a lot of activity around anything worth while. You can't really see this in RSS readers or on Twitter so it becomes a case of you having to find the nuggets in the river instead of letting other people find them for you and giving you a chance to see them before they pass by.
In the end, you have to realize that while you may miss some valuable content, more is always coming and chances are what you missed wasn't life altering. Whether it is on Twitter, Google Reader, or your podcatcher, great content will become obvious and you should let others find the great content for you so that you don't have to look for it yourself and feel guilty for missing something.
What do you do about your aggregated media guilt? I would love to hear how you cope with it and your strategies for fighting against it. Leave your stories in the comments!
Follow me on Twitter and FriendFeed!
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Blogroll
Buy me a Pizza!
Archives
- March 2010 (5)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (17)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (6)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (11)
- October 2008 (7)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (6)
- April 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (8)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (2)
- August 2007 (1)
- September 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (4)
- June 2006 (1)
Categories
- Advertising (4)
- Apple (10)
- blogging (21)
- Blu-ray (7)
- computers (3)
- Consumer Electronics (13)
- Desktop (2)
- DVD (3)
- E-mail (1)
- Education (1)
- format wars (1)
- gadgets (4)
- Gaming (21)
- Global Geek News (8)
- Google (1)
- HD-DVD (1)
- high-def (2)
- Hulu (1)
- Internet (33)
- Invites (1)
- Kindle (2)
- Linux (1)
- Microsoft (22)
- MIX 2010 (4)
- mobile OS (3)
- Net Neutrality (1)
- New Media (5)
- Nintendo (4)
- Old Media (2)
- online video (4)
- PDC 2009 (2)
- Personal Branding (5)
- piracy (3)
- Podcasting (5)
- Portable Media (8)
- Productivity (2)
- Red Hat (1)
- retail (7)
- Reviews (1)
- search (3)
- security (4)
- social networking (7)
- Software Development (1)
- Sony (7)
- storage (1)
- Tech Tips (2)
- TechCrunch50 (6)
- The Cloud (2)
- Twitter (15)
- Ubuntu (1)
- Uncategorized (21)
- User Experience (3)
- Viral Videos (1)
- Windows (4)