Global Geek News Blog The home of more Global Geek News insight and opinions

12May/090

Don’t let your social networks become your enemy in lawsuits

Greetings Readers,

For a long time now, I have advocated being very careful of what you put on your social networks.  From compromising photos on your facebook page to tweets about your desire to become the next Hitler, anything you post on social networks can and will likely be used against you if you don't think twice before posting them.  Not only can those drunken party pictures damage your chances of landing that great job, but they can also screw you out of winning a lawsuit.

This week, a man in Canada who was suing for damages resulting from two car accidents in 2001 and 2003 had many of his claims rejected because what he had posted on facebook was the complete opposite of what he was alleging in his lawsuit.  Long story short, he claimed that his social life had gone down the tubes and that his friends wouldn't speak to him, but his facebook pictures showed him hosting parties and socializing with a good number of friends.  The $1.3 million lawsuit only got him $40,000 thanks to the photos.

If you are going say one thing, especially in places where it really maters like a courtroom or a job interview, it is generally a very bad idea to have evidence to the contrary on your facebook profile, flickr page or any other social network to which you belong.  Not only can the truth come out and screw you (that is what you get for being dishonest), but social networks are a better way for people to get to know you which might not be a good thing depending on what you want them believing about you.

In the end, you have two real options, be completely honest with everybody at all times incase they want to check up on you, or think twice about what you put online and what people will think about what you post.

Follow me on Twitter!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray

15Dec/080

How Do You Pick Your Social Networking Friends?

Greetings Readers!

Last night, I was playing around with the cool new website, socialmedian, when I came across a post about the dangers of random friending.  This story got me to thinking about how I choose my friends on my various social networks.  After giving some thought to it, I thought it would make for an interesting blog post, so here it goes.

How do you decide who to friend on social networks?  Do you have have different rules for friending for the different social networks?  Personally, I have different rules for friending depending on the social network and what the use of the social network is.  For example, with only a couple of exceptions, if I friend somebody on a site such as Facebook, which I find to be a more personal social network as that is where I keep much of my contact information and various other things, it is because I personally know you or have had contact with you at some point.  This differs greatly from other networks that I am apart of.  On Twitter, I would say I am about as picky about the people I follow, but its based on different criteria.  When it comes to Twitter, I have two main criteria for me to follow you.  First, I will likely only follow you if you tweet about things that I find interesting or helpful.  Links to things showing me how I can do better with things such as blogging, podcast or others is probably the best way to have me follow you.  Second, you can't tweet too much.  I don't like it when people tweet excessively (20+ times a day).  If you are using your tweets to send great links and information, I usually overlook this, but I don't want my twitter stream to be flooded by a single person.  While I love Twitter, I don't want to spend all day staying up with my feeds because one or more of my twitter friends insist on Twittering until their fingers fall off.  Different yet again, is how I use FriendFeed.  If I friend somebody on FriendFeed, it is solely based on the content the produce and share.  If I like what you are posting, I will follow you to make my FriendFeed use more valuable.  It is kind of the fire hose approach, but I find its the best way to keep from missing out on great content.

One of the great things about social networking is that you can use the networks however you please.  It can be a great way to keep in touch with friends and family as well as a great promotional tool.  However you use your networks, I think the idea still remains that you are judged by the company you keep.  When I introduce somebody to a network such as Twitter, I will be showing them my profile and I want them to see that I can get value from Twitter by following people that are intelligent and willing to pass along information that I find helpful or informative in some way.  Being able to give myself a valuable experience based upon the people I friend on social networks is great, but it is also a great way to get new people on the service because they can see how such a service can provide value.

For many people, social networks can be about having great conversations.  I rarely use my social networks in such a manner, but that is based on some personal preferences that I might discuss at a later time, but it centers around having the option to respond but not feeling obligated to respond to what somebody has to say.  For people who use social networks for conversation, friending people largely becomes about who is an interesting person to have a conversation with.  I don't know about you, but I don't have much use for people that can't hold up their end of the conversation.  I'm not looking to have 'yes men' as friends (my ego isn't that big), but I do like to conversate with somebody who has an opinion about something and can support their position intelligently.  This is part of how I choose guests for my podcasts as well.

No matter how you choose to use the multitude of social networks, you likely have an opinion as to what makes a good social networking friend and how your choose your social networking friends.  How do you choose your social networking friends?  Do you take a cautious approach and friend only a few, or do you friend everybody and cut back on the people you don't think fit well with how you want to use a particular socail network?  Tell me how you handle freinding on social networks in the comments!

Follow me on Twitter!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray

15Sep/080

Best Buy and Napster is a Match Made in Heaven!

Greetings Readers!

Before I continue talking about some of the TechCrunch50 companies, I figure I needed to address the Napster acquisition by Best Buy.  There seems to be a lot of people in the blogosphere scratching their head about this move, so I figured I should explain why this is such a great move.  This can actually be summed up in one name, Wal-Mart.

Like many of you, I woke up to the news this morning that Best Buy purchased Napster for $121 million in cash.  I also noticed that the blogosphere seems to be at a complete loss as to the reason for this move.  While I generally enjoy any opportunity to bash the company I refer to as "Worst Buy," I think they made a great business move with this purchase.

Wal-mart has been in the digital music distribution game for a while now, becoming the #2 company for selling downloadable music online behind only iTunes.  Best Buy on the other hand is a bit late to the game when it comes to moving towards digital downloads.  By Best Buy purchasing an established name with a large customer base (approx. 700,000 subscribers), they can quickly jump into the digital downloads game with minimal time and effort spent to develop their own solution to compete with the company that is essentially their largest competitor in many areas.  Clearly realizing this is where the market is going, Best Buy needed to jump into digital downloads as soon as possible, and purchasing a company that has been synonymous with downloading music for over a decade is exactly what they needed to do before its too late and it becomes very difficult to gain any traction in the market.  Creating their own service, working out distribution deals and many other things that come along with starting your own digital download service would have put Best Buy even further behind and would have likely lead to a number of logistical issues rather than allowing them to hit the ground running.

Not only is this the perfect business decision for Best Buy, who does not want to be left in the dust, it is also a big thing for Napster.  Not only are they getting a nice sum of money, but the business they have can now be re-branded and taken to the next level.  Napster has had a problem for years now in that it can't seem to shake off the bad image it received when it was taken down by the music industry.  Many people are still unsure of the site because of its past, even though it has now become a legitimate place to get music.  By having a huge company such as Best Buy purchase them, it basically validates what they are doing and gives them the image that now they are a legitimate music destination rather than a haven for pirates.  It seems as though a major acquisition was the only way this image shift was going to occur.  And being paid twice what the company is worth for that to happen, isn't a bad deal either.

This is essentially a win/win for everybody involved.  Best Buy can jump into the market of music downloads with a large existing user base and can hit the ground running while Napster gets a big boost in their public image and paid twice what they company is worth.  The only people that should be concerned about this union are other companies involved in the market such as Amazon and MySpace who is about to launch their own music service this month.  Of course Wal-mart should be watching their back as well as this is a direct shot at them to send the signal that they aren't the only big company outside of Apple that can play the digital downloads game.  It is only a matter of time until the two get into a heated battle in this space, which im sure will get ugly and allow Apple to run off with all the money while the two giants fight it out.  This will be very exciting to watch no matter what and I look forward to seeing how the consumer benefits from this move.

That is all I have to say about this, but I do have more posts coming about several TechCrunch50 companies coming up over the next couple of days, so stay tuned for those!  Don't forget to check out my daily podcast for more top technology stories such as this one at GeekNewsDaily.com!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray