Don’t let your social networks become your enemy in lawsuits
Greetings Readers,
For a long time now, I have advocated being very careful of what you put on your social networks. From compromising photos on your facebook page to tweets about your desire to become the next Hitler, anything you post on social networks can and will likely be used against you if you don't think twice before posting them. Not only can those drunken party pictures damage your chances of landing that great job, but they can also screw you out of winning a lawsuit.
This week, a man in Canada who was suing for damages resulting from two car accidents in 2001 and 2003 had many of his claims rejected because what he had posted on facebook was the complete opposite of what he was alleging in his lawsuit. Long story short, he claimed that his social life had gone down the tubes and that his friends wouldn't speak to him, but his facebook pictures showed him hosting parties and socializing with a good number of friends. The $1.3 million lawsuit only got him $40,000 thanks to the photos.
If you are going say one thing, especially in places where it really maters like a courtroom or a job interview, it is generally a very bad idea to have evidence to the contrary on your facebook profile, flickr page or any other social network to which you belong. Not only can the truth come out and screw you (that is what you get for being dishonest), but social networks are a better way for people to get to know you which might not be a good thing depending on what you want them believing about you.
In the end, you have two real options, be completely honest with everybody at all times incase they want to check up on you, or think twice about what you put online and what people will think about what you post.
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
How Do You Pick Your Social Networking Friends?
Greetings Readers!
Last night, I was playing around with the cool new website, socialmedian, when I came across a post about the dangers of random friending. This story got me to thinking about how I choose my friends on my various social networks. After giving some thought to it, I thought it would make for an interesting blog post, so here it goes.
How do you decide who to friend on social networks? Do you have have different rules for friending for the different social networks? Personally, I have different rules for friending depending on the social network and what the use of the social network is. For example, with only a couple of exceptions, if I friend somebody on a site such as Facebook, which I find to be a more personal social network as that is where I keep much of my contact information and various other things, it is because I personally know you or have had contact with you at some point. This differs greatly from other networks that I am apart of. On Twitter, I would say I am about as picky about the people I follow, but its based on different criteria. When it comes to Twitter, I have two main criteria for me to follow you. First, I will likely only follow you if you tweet about things that I find interesting or helpful. Links to things showing me how I can do better with things such as blogging, podcast or others is probably the best way to have me follow you. Second, you can't tweet too much. I don't like it when people tweet excessively (20+ times a day). If you are using your tweets to send great links and information, I usually overlook this, but I don't want my twitter stream to be flooded by a single person. While I love Twitter, I don't want to spend all day staying up with my feeds because one or more of my twitter friends insist on Twittering until their fingers fall off. Different yet again, is how I use FriendFeed. If I friend somebody on FriendFeed, it is solely based on the content the produce and share. If I like what you are posting, I will follow you to make my FriendFeed use more valuable. It is kind of the fire hose approach, but I find its the best way to keep from missing out on great content.
One of the great things about social networking is that you can use the networks however you please. It can be a great way to keep in touch with friends and family as well as a great promotional tool. However you use your networks, I think the idea still remains that you are judged by the company you keep. When I introduce somebody to a network such as Twitter, I will be showing them my profile and I want them to see that I can get value from Twitter by following people that are intelligent and willing to pass along information that I find helpful or informative in some way. Being able to give myself a valuable experience based upon the people I friend on social networks is great, but it is also a great way to get new people on the service because they can see how such a service can provide value.
For many people, social networks can be about having great conversations. I rarely use my social networks in such a manner, but that is based on some personal preferences that I might discuss at a later time, but it centers around having the option to respond but not feeling obligated to respond to what somebody has to say. For people who use social networks for conversation, friending people largely becomes about who is an interesting person to have a conversation with. I don't know about you, but I don't have much use for people that can't hold up their end of the conversation. I'm not looking to have 'yes men' as friends (my ego isn't that big), but I do like to conversate with somebody who has an opinion about something and can support their position intelligently. This is part of how I choose guests for my podcasts as well.
No matter how you choose to use the multitude of social networks, you likely have an opinion as to what makes a good social networking friend and how your choose your social networking friends. How do you choose your social networking friends? Do you take a cautious approach and friend only a few, or do you friend everybody and cut back on the people you don't think fit well with how you want to use a particular socail network? Tell me how you handle freinding on social networks in the comments!
Follow me on Twitter!
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Has Facebook Shot Itself in the Foot with the Verified Apps program?
Greetings Readers!
Yesterday, Facebook announced their new Verified App program. For an app to qualify as to be a Verified App, it must be trustworthy. It must be secure, respectful, and transparent. Oh, and you must also pay $375.
What does the app get for this high price? Apps that get the Verified designation will be given a special badge to place on the application, designation on the application directory, plus a few other bonuses like advertising credits and easier rules on how many notifications, emails and invitations they can send out to users. Even though developers get all of this great stuff, Facebook only expects about 10% of its current 48,000 apps to qualify.
The real question is whether its worth it for developers to pay such a high price to become a Verified App? I really don't think it is. While it may be just a drop in the bucket for bigger companies that have Facebook apps and might seem worth it to show their customers that their app is trustworthy, I really don't see any point in it. If Facebook users have been getting by without that trustworthy guarantee or even caring about the applications they use enough to look into the security, I don't think that the majority of Facebook users will care of the applications they use are verified. Most probably won't even know what it means to be a Verified App other than the fact that it stands out from other applications that don't have it. If people really cared about how trustworthy the apps are, they would take the time to read the privacy statements and terms of use for each individual app that they use.
If the users aren't demanding an application be verified, then the developers shouldn't bother with the program. If they users don't care about whether the app is verified, what incentive is there for developers to make their apps verified and pay $375. Given the current state of the economy and online advertising, most people with simple apps can't afford that kind of price and it would take a long time to make enough money to cover the expense. Unless the developer is a large company, it really isn't worth it to pay that kind of price. I don't know any other open platforms that charge such a fee for anything, rather-less to just sport some badge of trust.
Facebook can certainly make some money off of this new program, but I don't think it is worth it. Because of the large money amount involved in getting this badge, I believe it will alienate more developers than will embrace it. When you have small developers who make applications for fun, they often do it because it is easy and cheap. The less of a barrier to entry there is, the more attractive it becomes to smaller developers. By creating such a program that insinuates that they have an application that isn't trusted because they don't have the money to get the Verified App badge, is essentially slapping the smaller developers in the face. Considering how big apps have become to the Facebook social network, snubbing the smaller developers is not a good move by Facebook. Insulting developers with high fees is not the way to make friends or grow the database of applications.
By Facebook turning its back on the smaller developer and basically saying they aren't big enough to matter, Facebook has shot themselves in the foot. While the idea might give the Facebook users some piece of mind, it shouldn't come at the expense of the developers. To create a sucessful platform, you must be able to balance the users desire for trust and security while keeping the barrier of entry to developers as low as possible. If Facebook wants true sucess, they must be willing to do everything they can to maintain this balance, but they are already off to a bad start. Hopefully they will see the error in their ways and make the appropriate changes to their program.
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Yammer won the TechCrunch50?! What were the judges smoking?
Hey readers!
This is my fist on a good number of posts coming out of the TechCrunch50, a truely amazing conference. Before I start posting my thoughts on many of the other companies that were at the conference, I figured I should start with the winner, Yammer.
For those of you that weren't at the conference, watching it on Ustream or reading the many blog posts from it, Yammer is basically a threaded Twitter clone for the enterprise environment (speaking of which, you can follow me on Twitter!). The creators apparently decided to steal the threaded conversations idea from Friendfeed, throw it into their Twitter clone and make it enterprise exclusive in the way that Facebook was exclusive in the early days where only people with university email addresses could join. In this case, its only for people with a company email address.
If you attended or followed the coverage of the conference, you would most likely agree that this was far from the most deserving company. They didn't even bother to change the Twitter look to something unique. Like many things that presented there, I would consider this more of a feature than a company. It would not take much for Twitter to do the same thing, plus they already know the micro-blogging space and have a good bit of experience under their belt. There were a number of truly revolutionary products unveiled at the event, but this was not one of them. Adgregate Markets and Swype were just two of the truly industry changing products that were far more deserving of the honor than a Twitter knockoff. I will of course be writing about those companies and many more in the next few days.
With over a thousand applicants to the conference, this makes me wonder just how bad the applicants were that didn't make the cut. I don't understand how this could have even been a finalist unless there were some kind of kickbacks to the judges or if the judges were too drunk from the parties to make a logical decision. I am completely baffled by this decision. They came up with a business model for Twitter, good for them. Sell the idea to Twitter, don't try to create a company out of a feature, especially when the same job can be accomplished in a more organized fashion with a simple message board.
Anyway, this is the first of many blog posts on my thoughts about what was presented at the conference. Over the next couple of days, I will be covering my favorite companies and companies that made me ask myself why how they got got past 1,000 other companies to get into the conference. I will also be doing a Global Geek News podcast in the next week also with more of my thoughts as well as on many of the other big topics, so stay tuned for that!
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Blogroll
Buy me a Pizza!
Archives
- April 2010 (5)
- March 2010 (11)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (17)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (6)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (11)
- October 2008 (7)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (6)
- April 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (8)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (2)
- August 2007 (1)
- September 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (4)
- June 2006 (1)
Categories
- Advertising (4)
- Apple (11)
- blogging (29)
- Blu-ray (7)
- computers (4)
- Consumer Electronics (17)
- Desktop (2)
- DVD (3)
- E-mail (1)
- Education (1)
- format wars (1)
- gadgets (6)
- Gaming (21)
- Global Geek News (9)
- Google (1)
- HD-DVD (1)
- high-def (2)
- Hulu (1)
- Internet (35)
- Invites (1)
- Kindle (2)
- Linux (1)
- Microsoft (31)
- MIX 2010 (7)
- mobile OS (3)
- Net Neutrality (1)
- New Media (5)
- Nintendo (4)
- Old Media (2)
- online video (4)
- PDC 2009 (2)
- Personal Branding (5)
- piracy (3)
- Podcasting (5)
- Portable Media (8)
- Productivity (2)
- Red Hat (1)
- retail (7)
- Reviews (1)
- search (3)
- security (4)
- social networking (7)
- Software Development (1)
- Sony (7)
- storage (2)
- Student Insiders (1)
- Tech Tips (2)
- TechCrunch50 (6)
- The Cloud (2)
- Twitter (15)
- Ubuntu (1)
- Uncategorized (21)
- User Experience (3)
- Viral Videos (1)
- Windows (6)