Is there anything Best Buy won’t do to screw its customers?
Greetings Readers!
Anybody who has ever dealt with Best Buy likely has their own horror stories about the giant, myself included and now they have a new tactic. Best Buy is now charging $130 to set up your Playstaion 3.
What do you get for your $130? You will get your PS3 plugged in, have its firmware updated, have your user accounts created and have the parental controls set up. Basically, stuff you shouldn't even need to look at the manual to figure out how to do. Why does Best Buy insist on ripping its customers like this? I am also curious who is dumb enough to pay $130 for this?
Here is the picture in case you need to see this ripoff to believe it.
Check out the latest Global Geek News Podcast!
Expect Playstation 3 shortages this Christmas season
Greetings Readers!
If you are hoping to pick up a Playstation 3 for the 2009 holiday season for yourself or somebody else, you better do it while you still can because shortages are being predicted.
Thanks to the record pace that the PS3 has been selling at since the price drop to $300 and the release of the PS3 Slim, Sony Executive Jack Tretton says that if sales continue at their current pace, there will be shortages of the PS3 sales this holiday season because demand is outpacing supply.
It is baffling that Sony didn't expect such a surge in sales when a new unit was released and the price was dropped. Considering everybody had been hoping for a price drop for the past year, they should know that it was going to make for a huge boost in sales so they would have made production great enough to meet demand through the holiday season.
There is no news on when the shortage will happen but I know why Sony is planning it, free publicity. Whenever a major consumer product has a shortage, it gets a writeup on all of the major sites which is good for the company and the product. This is the only reason I can think of that Sony would pull something like this. By creating a shortage, you give the appearance that the hottest item of the Christmas season is going to be the Playstation 3, even when it might not be true. Despite the fact that I understand this practice, I still find it horrible because come Christmas time, some kid isn't going to have the PS3 he was expecting because Sony wasn't willing to ramp up production for the holiday season.
Check out the latest Global Geek News Podcast!
Sony sets the PSP Go up for failure
Greetings Readers!
As many of you know, I am a longtime fan of Sony's PSP and I was initially looking forward to its sequel which turned out to be the PSP Go, but unfortunately it appears that Sony has set the portable gaming device up for failure. There are three primary ways that Sony is setting the PSP Go up for failure which are the focus of this post.
First, the biggest problem facing the PSP Go is the price. Considering the PSP Go plays the same content as the original PSP, there is no reason that Sony should be selling it at $250 when the original PSP which will continue to be sold, sells for under $170. While the original PSP was $250 when it shipped, those were very different economic times than what we are in now and the general rule I go by is that if a portable gaming device is more expensive than the most popular gaming console, it is overpriced. While it is great not having to deal with UMD disks that are constantly breaking, I don't think that justifies the cost when you realize that the screen is also smaller and and despite your expectations that the battery life would be better since there is no disk drive, they are actually about the same as the normal PSP. Oh, and the battery is not removable which is another strike against the Go.
Of course the price point of the system is only one big factor in the overall price of the device. The fact that you will need all new accessories is going to be another major expense tied to the device. If that wasn't bad enough, it looks like the games will cost more to download than they do in UMD format for the original PSP. Are you kidding me? I am going to have to pay more for downloadable games than for games with considerable production costs? I should be saving money because I am not in need of boxes, instructions, disks and whatever else, not spending more to get less! I am tired of paying more and getting less. Speaking of paying more and getting less...
Did you think I was finished talking about how much more you are going to have to pay to own the PSP Go? If you thought so, you would be wrong. In the ultimate slap in the face to everybody who already has the original PSP, the UMD conversion plan that Sony had once announced has been cancled for "legal and technical reasons." PSP owners, myself included, had thought that the price to migrate would be fairly cheap since we could convert all of our PSP game collection to digital versions for the PSP Go. Instead, the greedy fools at Sony now expect us to pay for our games all over again. I guess they figured that if people bought all of their music again when they migrated from cassette to CD that we would be willing to do it when we "upgraded" from a PSP to a PSP Go. They would be wrong in that assumption.
I had a lot of hope for the PSP Go when it first was announced but I think that hope is pretty much gone. With the launch of the PSP Go later this week (Oct. 1st), Sony has set the system up to fail miserably. It certainly isn't any competition for the lower priced DSi or even the iPhone. I had planned on getting the PSP Go on launch day just as I did with the PSP, but considering the overall cost of the device, games and accessories, I now have no plans on purchasing the device. If you can't sell you system to somebody like me that collects game systems regardless of whether I play them or not, you have real problems. Get ready for all of the PSP Go is a complete flop stories.
Check out the latest Global Geek News Podcast!
I am departing from TechVi
Greetings readers!
I come bearing a little bit of sad news today. As many of you know, since the middle of May, I have been writing over at the awesome tech news site, TechVi, but as of today, that is over. Unfortunately, things are too busy right now for me to try to write on a regular basis.
Three weeks ago, I started going back to school and what free time I enjoyed is now occupied with school related tasks. That is part of the reason why I haven't been blogging here quite as much as I would like and why this week's podcast was a couple days late (but it is up now, so go listen). Things are also getting busier for me at work so I don't have the down time at work to write or anything like I used to. I wish there were more hours in a day so that I could do everything but unfortunately my time machine still has some bugs to be worked out. I am not giving up anything on the Global Geek News so you guys have nothing to worry about there.
For the time being, this will be the exclusive place where I write all of my tech related opinions. Of course you can still find out what is going on with the rest of my life and various other things at my personal blog, Pcnerd37.com.
I really hate having to leave TechVi, but until things improve, it must be done because I can't be relied upon for regular writing until things improve or I can find a way to be more efficient. I do hope to write for them again in the future as it was the best writing experience I have ever had, I am just not sure how soon the future will get here.
I want to thank all of the guys at TechVi for everything they have done for myself and the site in my time there. Randall Bennett, the owner of TechVi is an amazing guy to work for and I look forward to working with him in the future. The dedication and skills of the entire team are amazing and I wish all of them great success in the future. You guys rock!
Apple’s 9-9-09 event thoughts…nap time!
Greetings readers!
Now that I have woken up from the sleep that Apple put me in, I figure I should comment on the very underwhelming event where Apple launched a couple of new iPods, changes some prices and launched iTunes 9.
Lets start off with the big news, Steve Jobs is back! It is great to see that Jobs is back and acknowledging his liver transplant which apparently came from an organ donor that was killed in a car accident. That said, either his shirt is really large or his is skin and bones with saggy man boobs which you can see in the picture below from gdgt. I would say he really needs to gain some weight. Less vegan food and a few more Big Macs would do him good. Anyway, he gave us some impressive numbers about 30 million iPhones being sold, 20 million iPod touches, and 1.8 billion apps have been downloaded.
On to iTunes! It seems Apple is jumping on the ringtone movement that died out long ago by selling over 30,000 ringtones for $1.29. Nice job at keeping up with current trends Apple! Next time, I recommend jumping on the bandwagon before the wagon has been abandoned in a field with only one wheel left. That said, I do like the look of the new iTunes as it has more of a Zune Marketplace kind of feel in some areas. The ability to manage apps directly from iTunes looks to be a great feature as well as bringing the Genius technology used to bring you the music you like to apps to help you find apps you might like. Finally, the iTunes LP stuff looks pretty impressive, especially if you are a music fan who likes pictures. Now onto the iPod news!
The first part of the iPod news talking about how it is a great gaming platform and such was real snooze of the show. While I do enjoy a couple of the games on my iPod Touch, they are trying to make it sounds far superior in nearly every way to the Nintendo DS and the Sony PSP. IT IS NOT! I will admit it has potential as a gaming device, but a touch screen will never beat the controls you will find on any handheld gaming device going all the way back to the Gameboy. Actually, I feel like ranting on this more, so that will be the focus of my next post, but I will let it go for now so we can focus on other iPod related news. Apparently Apple thinks that at the low price of $200, people will want to get an 8GB iPod Touch. 8GB Isn't enough to take most people's music collections, rather less video and apps. This was done purely to undercut the Zune HD who's 16GB version (the smallest size) is $220. Personally, I would prefer the far better audio experience and double the size for the extra $20. Apple can play the price war all it wants, but value speaks volumes. Speaking of the iPod Touch, the new 64GB version sounds nice but it needs more features, like maybe the camera everybody was expecting which came in the iPod Nano.
Before I talk about the Nano, the iPod classic has been upped to 160GB which I think is a bit too big. Not too big for a large music collection but who really needs to carry around 400,000 songs with them? I would call that overkill. Anyway, back to the Nano. It seems the Nano is getting the rumored camera that everybody figured the iPod Touch would get too. They didn't say much about the camera other than it could do video and had a mic. I would say its certainly a good update and a good play against the Flip camcorder but I wanted to see it on the iPod Touch as well since it is far more capable than the nano and would have some real uses for it. Oh, and both the nano and the shuffle have a bunch of new colors for those that care about about fashion. I have always found the many colors idea of gadgets kind of pointless but I guess I am not the average person. I am a proud owner of a poop brown Zune, so clearly I have no fashion taste. The only other noteworthy thing in relation to the Nano is the fact that it is getting an FM radio. For my opinion on that, scroll back up to the bandwagon comment since the Zune had this from day one as well as a good number of other portable media devices. If they really wanted to impress me, they would put in an AM radio.
That was pretty much the event. No Beatles, no camera in the iPod Touch, no Rolling Stones and no Mac tablet. The event was pretty much a big snooze and I am amazed that the stock didn't drop more than a whole 1% considering it usually plunges on even good release events like this. There is one image that they showed that I think speaks volumes about the idea of an Apple netbook. They talked about how the iPod Touch/iPhone are basically portable computers and showed an image (seen below) of some body trying to shove a Dell netbook into their back pocket. I think this is a good indication that a netbook isn't coming and that the closest thing you are going to get to one is and iPod Touch.
What did you think of the event? Exciting? Boring? Did Steve Jobs look healthy to you? Share your thoughts in the comments!
iTunes 9 breaks Palm Pre syncing
Greetings Readers!
From what I have seen, today's Apple event was largely a snooze. I did find one interested tidbit though, it seems that iTunes 9 (which I will be upgrading too as soon as I get home) has broken the syncing feature on the Palm Pre...again!
I predicted this would happen when the sync feature was announced. I generally like to compare this to Sony's fight with the PSP Homebrew scene since that is the best game of cat and mouse I can think of when it comes to hardware doing what it wasn't meant to do. It will be interesting to see if Palm can fix the problem with the WebOS 1.2 update that was due out yesterday but delayed.
If you have a workaround for Palm Pre owners, post it in the comments!
The secret to netbook success: Battery life!
Netbooks have been the hot item now for quite a while but the latest numbers out are showing a slowing in growth for netbook sales. While taking a quarter of the mobile computing market is impressive, if manufactures and retailers want to continue to ship these low margin products, they must focus on one thing, battery life.
For years, the biggest problem with that has faced the road warrior is battery life or lack of it on most laptops. On the average laptop, you are usually lucky if you see 2 1/2 hours of real world use on the battery. If you are using a gaming laptop like I do on occasion, you jump for joy if you hit an hour of average use when on your battery. Luckily, netbooks have hit the big time and they tend to have great battery life (in comparison). With most netbooks having nearly identical specs (screen size, processor, ram, ect.), the best way to market a product like this is with battery life. One of the things that often sets one netbook apart from another netbook (aside from the brand) is the size of the battery. Most netbooks have either 3 or 6 cell batteries. For many netbooks, a 3-cell battery will maybe get you 3 hours on a good day whereas I have seen the 6-cell in my Acer Aspire One go in the neighborhood of 7 hours. I have even seen advertisements for netbook battery life above 10 hours, but I never trust advertised battery life, which is a real problem for manufactures.
When most manufactures advertise battery life, they generally state the absolute most you will see and they do everything they can to achieve a higher number. Most manufactures use every trick they can come up with from turning the screen brightness as low as it will go to turning off the wifi all in the name of a higher battery life claim. It has become such a problem that most people don't even pay attention to advertised battery life and instead look for reviews from others that can give them an idea of what they will see in the real world. This is a problem that manufactures must shake off. There are two ways that they can do this, just advertise real world numbers (the honest way), or at least put the real world expectation of battery life next to the best possible battery life so that consumers have a better idea of what they are getting. Once you have some sort of honest way of reporting the battery life, then it is time to advertise it.
With most laptop owners yearning for more battery life, that is what manufactures should be targeting. I honestly don't expect to see netbooks get much cheaper in the near future so instead of trying to argue price, argue battery life. Full size laptops can be found pretty cheap these days so you need to give people a better reason than $100 difference to go with a netbook instead of a full size laptop and the battery life is where you can sell the product. While it will certainly have an effect on the sale of full size laptops which are a larger margin product, that is a good thing for a couple of reasons. One, it will help laptop manufactures to strive for better battery life which has desperately been needed for many years and two, you can still promote a full size laptop as doing much more than a netbook can do with much less hassle. While netbooks are easier to carry around, it is much more of a hassle to get the software you want installed on them and they aren't really made for doing any heavy computing like trying to edit some images, video or even crank out some code with a nice IDE like Visual Studio or Eclipse. Also, laptops hold much larger amounts of memory which is also a big selling point. If you push these points, it won't hurt sales as much as you think it might.
In the end, I believe both products can thrive in their own markets with the right marketing but you must market the features that matter most, especially when you have little to differentiate yourself from your competition.


