Global Geek News Blog The home of more Global Geek News insight and opinions

27Jan/090

Aggregated Media Guilt

Share on Facebook

Greetings Readers!

Do you ever feel guilty when you get behind on podcasts, rss feeds, tweets or any other form of aggregated media?  I have been suffering from this guilt which I like to call 'Aggregated Media Guilt' or AMG for short for quite some time and I think its time to address it here.

I can honestly say that I have been suffering from AMG ever since I started listening to podcasts.  I would often download podcasts without time to listen to them and end up falling behind.  This gave me a sense of guilt because I had a ton of podcasts that I never got around to listening to.  Sometimes I would merely delete them and try to forget about them, but many times the guilt was such that I would end up spending a minimum of 9 hours a day listening to podcasts just so I could be caught up and not miss anything.  At the time, I only had this guilt from podcasts, but I hadn't really discovered the wonders that are Twitter and RSS feeds.

Eventually, I became an avid Twitter and RSS reader user which has been just as bad if not worse than the guilt I suffered from podcasts.  Now, I am checking my Twitter every few minutes, reading over 100 tweets every morning when I get up to make sure I haven't missed anything and reading hundreds of items in my Google Reader every day.  Why am I doing this?  I have this feeling that if I don't, I am missing out on something.  I will admit that many things in my RSS feed or Twitter feed are things that I don't care about or just a bunch of people saying the same thing.  While this ultimately sucks up more time to sift through these items, I feel it is necessary so I don't miss something that I find important.  I am not one to get addicted to anything, but I admit that I have become an aggregated media addict.

Do you or people you know suffer from the same problem?  Do you fell like you are missing something if you don't see everything?

I believe I have come up with a solution.   I find that if I have a manageable level of aggregated media, I experience guilt, but if I have a source of aggregated media that is not possible to keep up with, the guilt goes away.  For example, I follow around 200 people on Twitter.  This is a fairly manageable feed as there is probably only in the neighborhood of 500 updates a day or so.  Some of those updates I find valuable and others I don't so they get glanced over.  In the end, I am trying to find the value which makes me check my Twitter every couple of minutes to see what I have missed and what conversations I can join in on.  Friendfeed on the other hand is very different for me.  I follow a large number of people on there so that there is so much stuff that is aggregated and passes by that there is no possible way that I can read everything.  Realizing this, it completely changes my mindset and gets rid of my guilt.  By knowing that I cant keep up with it no matter how hard I try, it frees me from thinking I need to spend all of my time trying to consume what is shared.

In the end, with the way that comments and likes are done with FriendFeed, it becomes much easier for me to pick out the interesting items on FriendFeed because there is generally a lot of activity around anything worth while.  You can't really see this in RSS readers or on Twitter so it becomes a case of you having to find the nuggets in the river instead of letting other people find them for you and giving you a chance to see them before they pass by.

In the end, you have to realize that while you may miss some valuable content, more is always coming and chances are what you missed wasn't life altering.  Whether it is on Twitter, Google Reader, or your podcatcher, great content will become obvious and you should let others find the great content for you so that you don't have to look for it yourself and feel guilty for missing something.

What do you do about your aggregated media guilt?  I would love to hear how you cope with it and your strategies for fighting against it.  Leave your stories in the comments!

Follow me on Twitter and FriendFeed!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray

 
26Jan/090

Is Microsoft repeating its Vista version mistakes with Windows 7?

Share on Facebook

Greetings Readers!

Have you or somebody you know experienced confusion with Windows Vista because of the large number of versions?  While I admit that I was never confused by the version differences other than the fact that I found the whole idea stupid, it seems that Microsoft wants to create more confusion yet again with 5 versions of Windows 7.

Reported versions of Windows 7

Late last week, a screenshot surfaced from what is supposedly build 7025 of Windows 7 showing 5 different versions of Windows 7.  Apparently Microsoft didn't get the memo that having so many versions is confusing to the average consumer.  The average consumer doesn't understand the differences between Home Basic, Home Premium, or Ultimate, rather less business or anything else.  Few consumers know what the different features are at the time of purchase rather less if they will use it.  The average Joe doesn't understand things like full drive encryption or some of the media capabilities that come with Windows.  Unfortunately, Microsoft has taken the route of confusion instead of making things easy on the consumer.

Of course this is better for Microsoft than it is the consumer.  Rather than trying to limit customer confusion and be the customer friendly operating system, they try to make money by making people think that premium is better than basic and ultimate is better than both and trying to get consumers to purchase them whether they need it or not based on the fact that it sounds better.  After reading the book Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions by Dan Ariely (I cannot recommend this book enough, it is great!), I completely understand what they are doing here but I don't believe it is a good thing for the consumer or Microsoft.

Windows 7 Starter is likely the most stripped down piece of crap version of Windows 7 there is (I am not saying that Windows 7 is crap, I actually love it, I am just comparing it based on the names of the other SKUs).  Assuming this isn't a completely stripped down version for Netbooks (the beta which is Ultimate runs quite well on netbooks), Microsoft actually expects to sell few if any of this version.  Why have this version you ask?  To make the others look better.  If the price difference isn't that huge, the average person is going to go for the version that sounds better.  Microsoft is simply trying to capitalize on this.

The bad part about this strategy is that it leads to confusion.  What is the difference between the versions?  What is the best bang for my buck?  What features do they have?  Will I ever use these features?  Are there better third party alternatives to what is offered built in?  These are only some of the bigger questions that the average consumer is stuck with when you have so many different versions.  If you want to be seen as the most consumer friendly version, especially with companies such as Apple gaining strength, confusion should be your enemy.

I will admit that just having a single version of Windows isn't necessarily the best answer.  I believe that there should only be 2 versions of Windows, a business version and a home version for everybody else.   Much like the business version of Vista, the Business version of Windows 7 should have things such as full hard drive encryption, more protection against hardware failure, remoting support among other things that the average consumer doesn't really need.  Of course there are plenty of other vendors that sell such software, so if there are any power users out there that need this functionality, they can easily get it.  Business should also be stripped of some of the media capabilities since it is usually better to have employees working rather than streaming movies to their Xbox.  The consumer version on the other hand should have a plethora of media capabilities and the stuff that the consumers might want to do.

That said, I know there are some consumers that want some of the business features such as the hard drive encryption but don't want to use other software such as TrueCrypt.  I also understand that some businesses are very media focused.  My solution to this is to have a store where you can buy certain features of the other version if necessary.  By using a method such as this, people will get what they want on their machine without all of the other crap.  This would greatly simplify things and make it much easier for consumers to determine what they need and get it instead of being up-sold to the Ultimate or whatever version so you can have the features of everything even if you don't need it.

Get rid of the Starter, Home Basic, and Home Premium and Ultimate versions and just call it Windows 7 Home and then the Windows 7 Business version.  Two versions is all you need.  Anything more and it causes confusion.  If Microsoft wants to put Vista behind them, they need to fix the mistakes they made with Vista and I believe this is probably the biggest one.

Follow me on Twitter and Friendfeed!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray

 
13Jan/090

Jott Kills Its Free Services, Saddens Users Everywhere

Share on Facebook

Greetings Readers!

Moments ago, I just got an email from the raved about service Jott.  In the email, it stated that Jott Basic and other free services such as its much acclaimed speech-to-text will no longer be free starting February 2, 2009.   This also includes Jott Notepad for the iPhone.

I had had a Jott account for sometime but have only used the service once.  I never think about it when I need to take a note, I just type out a note in my Blackberry.  I know a number of people that use it and love it since its a free service.  Unfortunately the free service is about to die.

According to Jott, the reason for the change is because of the economy.  The poor economic climate has caused them to focus 100% on profitibablity which means ending the free service that they made themselves known with.  They say that they had planned on doing a ad supported version but it is not viable right now and that it would ruin the user experience.  I tend to agree with them on everything.  Providing the service that they do is hard to keep free in these times and for a service such as Jott, I think it is worth the money if you use the service.  I also am not a fan of the ad supported model.   I follow the idea of Ken Rutkowski in that start-ups should have 5 ways of making money and the primary way should never be advertising.

While it is sad to see the free service go, the Pro subscription is only $3.95/mo so it is still a very affordable service if you use it often.  For those that want to upgrade, they put details in their announcement as well as some codes for 10% off an annual subscription.  If you haven't tried it, I recommend checking out the service while it is still free to find out if the pro account will benefit you.

Follow me on Twitter!

Follow me on FriendFeed!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray

 
12Jan/091

TweetReplies Makes Sure You Never Miss an @ Reply

Share on Facebook

Greetings Readers!

I thought I would write a quick post to share a great new Twitter service that I have discovered with my readers.  As you may have guessed from the post title, the new service is called TweetReplies.

For those that have never heard of TweetReplies, it is a new service that helps make sure you never miss an @ reply.  TweetReplies emails you whenever you have an @ reply so you never have to wait around for your friends to reply to your latest tweet.  With many people able to get their email via their phone, you can rest assured that you will know if you get an @ reply even if you are away from your computer.  But that's not all!  TweetReplies will also make an RSS feed out of your replies!

If you are like me and obsessively try to aggregate everything you are interested in into your Google Reader, this is the service for you.   By turning your @ replies into an RSS feed, you can save that precious click from your RSS reader to your Twitter client.  This is also very handy for those that use Google Reader to share rss items with others.  You can now share your tweet replies without having to worry about retweeting or trying to cut down a tweet enough to retweet it to all of your followers.

There is one great thing that I probably should have mentioned sooner.  What is this wonderful thing you ask?  TweetReplies does all of this WITHOUT your Twitter password!  With the recent Twitter phishing and hijacking attacks, this is probably the most important feature.  Never giving out your password unless absolutely necessary is always the best policy and TweetReplies seems to understand this.  You can rest easy knowing that you haven't given your password to another third party service that could potentially try to hijack your account.

If you are looking to get your Twitter replies from email or RSS, this is the service for you.

Follow me on Twitter!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray

 
7Jan/090

Apple’s Keynote Disappoints Yet Again, Secrecy to Blame

Share on Facebook

Greetings Readers!

Much like everybody else, I was glued to my laptop yesterday for yesterday's Macworld keynote from Apple (I even live blogged the event), only to be disappointed.  While there were a few decent announcements (DRM-free music on iTunes and new prices), the event was almost entirely a snooze-fest.

There are many reasons that could be used for why the event was so boring, everything from the lack of Steve Jobs to the fact that most of the rumored items that people had been hoping for didn't show up, but I believe the main reason is Apple's constant secrecy surrounding all of its events.

Apple has a history of being secretive about everything until the moment it is announced.  Sure, there is the occasional leak, but on the whole, nobody really knows anything for sure until its announced.  This can certainly give Apple the shock factor when something big is announced, but ultimately, I believe they are shooting themselves in the foot with this strategy.

The secrecy that surrounds the events leads to two things, over-hype and rumors.  These are the two largest causes for disappointment at any Apple event.  The rumor mill usually starts working overtime around a month or so before an announcement, spinning off every wild idea from the retirement of Steve Jobs to an iPhone Nano (which I still believe is an idea that is beyond stupid) only to end up leaving people with higher expectations than they should have.  No company can make everything and hit a home run with every press event, but thanks to the rumor mill, it is expected of Apple.  If Apple would reveal what its events were about before hand, it would largely kill the over-hype caused by expectations created from the wild internet rumors.  Opening up about the events would allow the hype to be adjusted down to a reasonable level.

The over-hype is really a big problem.  Thanks to the rumors and crazed Apple fans, Apple events become over-hyped which leads to a feeling of under-delivery.  Asking people, mainly journalists, to come from around the world to cover your products when you tell them nothing about what you are going to talk about is a bit much.  If people knew beforehand what is going to be discussed, they would determine if their presence is required and ultimately the expectations and hype around the event that bring people from around the globe would be at a more manageable level.

While any coverage is good coverage for most companies, if Apple expects to have happy customers and stock holders, they need to kill the rumors and over-hype by being less secretive.  Apple's stock tends to swing quite a bit around announcements and I think that if Apple wasn't so secretive, these huge swings would not exist.  Secrecy might be warrented in some cases, but unless there is a major shift in company strategy, being open and letting people know what they are in for is the best way to control reactions from events such as this.

Follow me on Twitter!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray

 
6Jan/090

Macworld 2009 Apple Keynote Liveblog

Share on Facebook

I am live blogging the Apple Macworld 2009 keynote speech.  Click the link below to watch the coverage!

Click Here

Follow me on Twitter!

-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray