Microsoft Looking for Exclusive Content for Zune, Spins Wheels
Greetings Readers!
As most all of you are aware, the Zune has never lived up to anybody's expectations in terms of sales. In a far distant second place, Microsoft sells as many Zune players in a year as Apple sells iPods in a month. While it is a competent media device, there is nothing that really makes to Zune stand out as a must have device over the iPod with the exception of getting more GB for the price. Before I go any further, I should say that I am a Zune owner and will gladly point out its good points and bad when asked as I have no loyalty to a device or its manufacture. I merely purchased it because I got the 30GB version for $100 last Black Friday. Anyway, with a third version Zune still a ways away, Microsoft is trying to find any possible way it can to gain ground in the portable media marketplace.
Microsoft's latest move to try to gain market share is around exclusive content. They are trying to take the idea behind the game console market and apply it to the portable media market. While the model of having exclusive content to sell the platform would likely work if it had a larger presence in the portable media player market, I don't think it has much of a chance of working right now. Since Microsoft waited so long to get into the portable media player market, it is in a position where it has almost no chance of unseating Apple as the king of the portable media market. When you are in that kind of position, if you have any hope of gaining a reasonable amount of market share, you must have a product that is 50% or 100% better than your competitor. Microsoft didn't do this and it has hurt them. There is nothing that separates the Zune from the iPod in terms of functionality. Without some kind of big distinction, they will have a hard time promoting themselves as something other than a cheaper alternative that doesn't have the special things like the App Store. Microsoft must improve the base functionality that ships with the unit before exclusive content can make a real difference.
When you look at the gaming console market, the exclusive content model works great and always has, as demonstrated when consoles come bundled with games whether its the PS3 coming with Metal Gear Solid 4 or the NES coming with Mario Brothers. The reason that this model works here is because no console ever got to the truely dominant position or where one system tried to come out after another one already had 90% of the market. When a new generation of consoles is released, its around the same time, with similar technical specs (the Wii is a special case here as Nintendo went in another direction) so the software, the exclusive content is what really drives the sales of the consoles. Even though the Xbox 360 has similar performance to the PS3, if it wasn't for exclusives like Halo, it would not be where it is today.
Microsoft is trying to do the same thing with the Zune, get outside media companies to make shows or other kinds of content exclusive for the Zune. While this is a perk for existing Zune users, its going to have little affect on the adoption rate of the Zune or its position in the portable media player marketplace because its not on an even playing field where it is just looking for something to set itself apart.
At this point, Microsoft almost has to wait for the next release of the Zune to have any hopes of competing with the iPod. Sure, firmware updates will get you a long way, but the hardware must be more capapble before it can be a real threat to the iPod. At this point, Microsoft is just spinning their wheels with this unless they are using it as a launching platform for the third version of the Zune. If they can create a base of existing exclusive content to complement a vastly improved third version of the Zune, they might have a chance, but exclusive content on its own in this market situation is just a case of throwing money at a situation that isnt improving.
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray
Apple Can Remotely Disable iPhone and iPod Touch Apps
Greetings Readers!
Engadget is reporting that iPhone hacker, Jonathan Zdziarski, has discovered an app blacklisting capability in the iPhone and iPod Touch that allows Apple to remotely disable apps on your device. The device phones home on occasion to check if any apps that have been blacklisted are on the device. If so, Apple can remotely disable the apps on your device, even after you have paid for it and downloaded it.
There are a couple of reasons to be angered here. While a case could certainly be made that it is for the security of the device when trying to stop programs that have Trojans or something built in, I don't think that is the real issue here. First, this is happening without your knowledge!
Apple should have been upfront about this kind of "feature" rather than burying it deep in a configuration file so that a hacker had to find it. Apple should not be secretly altering things in a users device, especially for apps that they have purchased. This is an extreme violation of privacy and it makes little sense. If you have to approve apps before they go on the apps store, why would you later blacklist such an app? If you had done your job in the first place, a problem app would never hit the app store!
With no acknowledgment about this from Apple, there is no stated policy of what happens with the money that was spent on the app. Do you get a refund if an app that you have is blacklisted? Does the creator of the blacklisted app still get his 70% of every purchase? Does Apple keep their 30% for having distributed the app in the first place? There are far more questions than answers here and until Apple opens up and clarifies this issue. Where does the money go?!
Apple must face the music and give details about what is going on here. Considering the fact that the 3G iPhone is still selling like crazy, it cant afford a black eye like this that could put a dent in the rate of adoption. I am now rethinking my idea of purchasing a 32GB iPod Touch for this reason (the outrageous price doesn't help either).
Post your thoughts on this issue in the comments as this is something that deserves a real discussion.
-Jeremy "pcnerd37" Bray